The GTM operating manual for your AI.
Everything your revenue org knows about itself (territories, comp plans, deal desk rules, Salesforce config, rules of engagement), structured for LLMs.
Ops Context learns from the systems you run, and keeps the manual current without anyone maintaining it.
Your operating manual
revenue operations
Go to market
Segments and ICP
Territories and books
Routing rules
Revenue process
Lead management
Deal desk and approvals
Renewals and expansion
Compensation
Comp plans by role
Quota and ramp
SPIFs and disputes
Systems
Salesforce objects and fields
CPQ and billing
What syncs where
People
Who owns what
Teams and reporting lines
Approval authority
Accounts
Customers
Partners
Competitors
Written from Salesforce, Notion, Confluence, Drive and your own site. Every fact carries the source it came from.
Make Claude smarter, faster, and cheaper
Every session starts from zero. Your LLM queries Salesforce, Notion, Confluence, and Drive to rebuild your company from scratch on every question. Billing you every step of the way.
Save time and tokens by hooking your agents up directly to a single authoritative operations manual.
With the operating manual
cost
4s
1 lookup
cited
Without it
cost
0s
0 lookups · still going
A self-improving operating manual designed for LLMs
Writes itself
It already knows the things nobody wrote down. Ops Context reads your systems and works out what your company is made of, subject by subject: every product, customer, competitor, partner, team, person, policy and process, and every object in your Salesforce org, field by field.
Where the documentation stops, it keeps going.
280
people and who owns what
81
Salesforce objects
77
teams
75
processes
34
customers
35
plans and policies
20
internal systems
16
integrations
762 subjects at one production deployment. Nobody on that team wrote any of it.
Identifies errors
Finds the places your documentation and your systems disagree, and the places two documents disagree with each other.
Most companies have never seen this list, because nobody has ever read every page against every system at once. Ops Context does it on every pass, and it keeps doing it: a page that was right in March and a flow that changed in September is a conflict the day the flow changes.
Nothing is quietly resolved. Where sources disagree, the answer says so and gives both positions with their dates, and where nothing answers the question at all, it says that too.
Doc vs. system
The SOP says discounts over 25% need Deal Desk. The validation rule on Quote fires at 20%.
The rule is what runs.
Doc vs. doc
Two renewal runbooks are live (one written before the acquisition, one after) and they disagree on co-term renewals.
Both, with their dates.
Gone stale
The territory model page hasn't changed since March. The assignment flow behind it was rewritten in September.
Flagged to its owner.
Improves itself
Takes each conflict to whoever owns it, gets the truth, and fixes the record.
A correction that contradicts a sourced fact isn’t taken at face value. Ops Context confirms with the owner, updates the manual, and offers to fix the page it came from.
Documentation is the project nobody finishes. Every company has the half-written version: the Notion page from two reorgs ago, the deck that was accurate in March, the process only one person can explain. Point Ops Context at what already exists, however scattered, however out of date. Nothing to migrate, reorganize or rewrite first, and from then on upkeep is its problem: edit a page, close a deal, change a field, and the answers move with you.
Conflicts with a sourced fact
Held: renewals under $50k require a security review.
Source: Enterprise renewal policy · Notion · owned by Priya Raman, Security & Compliance
Ops Context
AppOps ContextApp9:12 AM
Dana mentioned the security review for renewals under $50k was dropped in September. The policy page still requires it. Is Dana right?
Enterprise renewal policy
Notion · last edited 14 Mar
Priya Raman9:26 AM
Yes, we dropped it on 3 September. The page is out of date.
Ops ContextApp9:26 AM
Thanks. Recorded, attributed to you. Want me to update the Notion page too?
Frequently asked questions
Almost certainly yes, and we plan for it. Connecting any new tool to Claude goes through your connector review, and self-hosted deployments go through your infrastructure review instead. We give your champion the review kit up front (data-flow diagram, permission model, pre-filled security questionnaires), and we'll join the call. A read-only deployment is supported, and so is running the whole thing in your own cloud.
In a read-only deployment, only the search query and which answers were read, each written to your own audit log. If you turn on the learning loop, Claude also sends facts it learned about your company, which you can review one by one and withdraw at any point. Never the rest of the conversation, and never your customers' data.
Yes, and we usually recommend it. Start with questions and answers only, prove the value, and turn on the learning loop as a separate decision once you've seen what it would send.
No. Answers are rebuilt when their sources change, corrections arrive from your team's own sessions, and new subjects appear as the evidence does. The only human artifact is a short template describing what's in scope, which we write with you during onboarding.
Nothing a chat says is published directly. Each fact is checked against what Ops Context already holds, deduplicated, and stripped of personal details and anything resembling a secret before it can be cited. Everything is attributed to the person whose session it came from, and anything accepted can be withdrawn, which also removes the answers that relied on it.
Yes. Ops Context runs in your cloud environment or ours, which is the usual answer when you have data-residency obligations or a policy against cloud connectors. One of our production deployments is self-hosted today.
Ops Context is served over the Model Context Protocol, which is an open standard, so any MCP-capable client can read it. Claude is what we support and test end to end today; tell us what you run and we'll tell you honestly where it stands.
Those search the documents someone wrote. Ops Context learns from the systems that actually run your company (including your Salesforce configuration, which no search tool can read for you), answers in the tool your team is already in, and gets corrected by the people using it. If your answer exists in a document somebody maintains, search is fine. The problems we solve are the answers that only exist across four systems and one person's head.
Ops Context is in early access while we refine it. Ultimately pricing will be a fraction of the operations time it saves, far less than a full-time hire.
See it on your company first
Give us your domain and we'll have Ops Context learn your company from your public site: no contract, no credentials, nothing for anyone to approve. It's a fraction of what it knows with your Salesforce, and it's enough to judge us on.